News

The Most Damning Piece of Evidence Tulsi Gabbard Dropped Against Obama and his Cronies in the Russia Collusion Hoax

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released definitive proof that the Russia collusion hoax was fabricated by Barack Obama and his inner circle. The finishing touches on the hoax that would lead to two presidential impeachments against Donald Trump, and which would hamstring his first administration, were invented in December 2016.

Director Gabbard has made criminal referrals to the Department of Justice. She’s calling for most of the key figures in the Obama administration to be prosecuted for treasonous conspiracy against President Trump and the United States.

Let’s run through the timeline:

in May 2016, after Seth Rich leaked the DNC emails to Wikileaks and murdered for his trouble, the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s campaign started claiming that Russia “hacked our democracy.” They didn’t hack anything. Nothing was hacked!

Embarrassing emails from the DNC and Clinton campaign manager John Podesta were leaked. Those emails showed that the DNC considered black donors to be “nappy-headed” and “pushy,” and that internally the Clinton campaign referred to their Hispanic voter outreach as “Operation Taco Bowl.” We also learned that John Podesta has a fascination with prepubescent girls in swimsuits. But there was no Russian hacking.

On December 8, 2016, the ODNI assembled a PDB that stated, once again, that Russia didn’t hack the election and didn’t have the capability to do so. That briefing was pulled by then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.

It was replaced by a new memo for the December 9, 2016, presidential briefing. The new memo claimed that Russia had hacked our election infrastructure, casting doubt on President Trump’s decisive victory over Hillary Clinton.

The individuals present at the meeting, which was the unofficial launch of the Russia collusion hoax, were as follows:

Obama; former DNI James Clapper; former CIA Director John Brennan; former National Security Advisor Susan Rice; former Secretary of State John Kerry; former Attorney General Loretta Lynch; former FBI Director James Comey; and former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.

Here’s just a small sampling of the headlines that began appearing in the mainstream Fake News Media after that December 9 meeting:

The Washington Post: “Secret CIA Assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win the White House.”

The New York Times: “Russian Hackers Acted to Aid Trump in Election, U.S. Says.”

NBC News: “U.S. Officials: Putin Personally Involved in U.S. Election Hack.”

For those who have forgotten, this next clip should give you a sense of just how far-ranging and important this treasonous conspiracy was. This is the brain trust of the Senate Armed Services Committee:

Immigration Battle: Noem vs. Liberal Media

Noem’s Bold Stance on Media Coverage

Kristi Noem, the newly appointed Secretary of Homeland Security, is not holding back in her criticism of how mainstream media covers immigration. In her first 100 days, Noem has spearheaded a campaign to hold media outlets accountable for what she sees as biased and sympathetic portrayals of undocumented immigrants, particularly those with criminal records. Noem argues that these narratives undermine the safety and security of American communities, a core focus of the Trump administration’s renewed border strategy.

At a Glance

• Kristi Noem, as Secretary of Homeland Security, criticizes media for biased coverage of immigration.
• Noem claims a significant reduction in border encounters and illegal migration.
• The administration is focusing on strict enforcement and public messaging to deter illegal immigration.
• Media coverage remains a contentious battleground in shaping public opinion on immigration.

Israel Expands Operations

Israel expanded its ground operations into the previously spared city of Deir al-Balah in central Gaza for the first time yesterday. Deir al-Balah is one of the area’s primary humanitarian hubs, where displaced Palestinians have been sheltered, and contains aid warehouses, health clinics, and critical water infrastructure. Nearly 88% of the Gaza Strip is estimated to have been evacuated or classified as military zones, with roughly 2 million Palestinians displaced.

 The Israeli military advance comes as officials believe some of the 50 remaining hostages, abducted during Hamas’ cross-border attack on Oct. 7, 2023, may be held in Deir al-Balah. At least 20 of the hostages are thought to be still alive. 

 Meanwhile, the UK, Canada, Japan, and 25 other countries issued a joint statement yesterday criticizing Israel’s approach to, and restrictions on, aid delivery in Gaza. The Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry reported more than 1,000 Palestinians have died since late May while attempting to access aid, and the UN has said nearly 800 casualties have occurred en route to or at aid sites operated by the US- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. 

Harvard Funding Hearing

Lawyers for Harvard University and the Trump administration appeared in federal court yesterday over whether Harvard can recoup roughly $2.6B in research grants. 

 The administration cut the grants in April after accusing Harvard of antisemitism; a letter last month from the Education Department found Harvard guilty of violating Jewish students’ civil rights (read here). Harvard says the cuts were retaliatory after the Ivy League rejected demands by a federal task force to end all diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and rework its faculty hiring and admissions process, among other changes. 

 Harvard is the world’s largest academic research institute with a $53.2B endowment, and is responsible for more scientific output than any other university. Since the Trump administration began cutting funding, the university has paused hundreds of research projects, including on tuberculosis, ALS, and chemotherapy. 

 The federal judge yesterday appeared poised to rule in Harvard’s favor. If so, President Donald Trump has pledged to appeal. 

Four-Day Workweek Study

Results from the largest trial of four-day workweeks, published yesterday, revealed the shortened schedule—without any pay cuts—boosts job satisfaction, reduces burnout, and improves well-being. 

 Nearly 2,900 workers from 141 organizations in the US, Canada, the UK, Ireland, Australia, and New Zealand shifted to 32-hour four-day weeks for six months. Companies had two months to restructure workflows, largely by trimming unnecessary meetings. At the end of the study, employees reported improved performance, better sleep, and less fatigue. Over 90% of participating companies kept the truncated schedule, suggesting output and profit weren’t harmed, though the study didn’t measure company-wide productivity.

 While many Americans view the five-day workweek as standard, it only became commonplace after the passage of the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1938. Interest in shorter workweeks has grown since the COVID-19 pandemic reignited conversations about work-life balance, with 22% of national survey respondents reporting their employer offered four-day weeks in 2024, compared to 14% in 2022.