News

Lees-McRae College celebrates records and biggest year of fundraising in institution’s 125-year history
June 11, 2025
Friday, June 13th
June 12, 2025
Lees-McRae College celebrates records and biggest year of fundraising in institution’s 125-year history
June 11, 2025
Friday, June 13th
June 12, 2025
News

News

June 12, 2025

 

 
CDC Trust Crisis — Kennedy Plan Sparks Uproar

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has fired all 17 members of the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee, citing deep-rooted conflicts of interest that have transformed the panel into “little more than a rubber stamp” for pharmaceutical interests.

Key Takeaways
  • Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has removed all 17 members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), claiming persistent conflicts of interest have compromised their objectivity.
  • The committee, established in 1964, plays a crucial role in determining vaccine recommendations that influence national health policy and insurance coverage.
  • Kennedy aims to restore public trust in vaccine science through this overhaul, with new committee members set to meet from June 25-27 at CDC headquarters.
Restoring Public Trust or Undermining Public Health?

Kennedy has framed his decision as essential for rebuilding public confidence in vaccine science and eliminating corruption from the approval process. His concerns center on what he describes as the committee’s failure to provide proper scrutiny of vaccines, particularly those administered to vulnerable populations. “It has never recommended against a vaccine–even those later withdrawn for safety reasons. It has failed to scrutinize vaccine products given to babies and pregnant women,” Kennedy asserted in his statement.

“A clean sweep is necessary to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science, ACIP new members will prioritize public health and evidence-based medicine. The Committee will no longer function as a rubber stamp for industry profit-taking agendas,” Kennedy said.

One Year in Jail? TRUMP Drops Bombshell

President Trump has proposed a mandatory one-year jail sentence for burning the American flag, directly challenging a long-standing Supreme Court decision that protects such acts under the First Amendment.

Key Takeaways
  • President Trump announced plans to work with senators to implement a one-year jail sentence for burning the American flag
  • The proposal comes amid ongoing anti-ICE protests in major cities where flag burning has occurred
  • The Supreme Court’s 1989 Texas v. Johnson ruling established flag burning as protected symbolic speech
  • Trump deployed 4,100 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to protect federal officials conducting deportation operations
  • Trump suggested California Governor Gavin Newsom could potentially face charges for obstructing ICE operations
  • “They proudly carry flags of other countries, but they don’t carry the American flag. They only burn it,” said President Donald TrumpThe President further committed to this position by stating, “People that burn the American flag should go to jail for one year. And we’ll see if we can get that done.” Trump revealed he is already collaborating with several senators, including Missouri GOP Senator Josh Hawley, to advance legislation that would criminalize flag burning. This marks a significant policy initiative that will likely face constitutional challenges given current Supreme Court precedent.
Senate Sends ICE Bill to Stein for Approval

North Carolina’s GOP-controlled Senate approved Senate Bill 153 on Tuesday, which requires the State Bureau of Investigation, State Highway Patrol, and North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections to cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials. The measure now goes to Democratic Gov. Josh Stein, who has yet to veto a bill.

SB153 requires the aforementioned state agencies to enter into agreements with ICE and ensure that employees are trained to identify individuals in custody who are in the country illegally. The bill also bars illegal immigrants from accessing state benefits and allows lawsuits against sanctuary jurisdictions.

Also on Tuesday, the Senate passed House Bill 318, which expands requirements for sheriff’s offices statewide to comply with ICE detainers. That bill is headed back to the House for further discussion.

The legislative measures were voted on the same day President Trump deployed National Guard troops to Los Angeles amid protests over federal immigration arrests.

Article Icon 1ICE Protests Pop Up Across NC

As the North Carolina General Assembly advanced bills to expand cooperation with ICE, at least 25 protests opposing ICE immigration arrests erupted nationwide this week, including several in North Carolina.

Protesters gathered in Raleigh and Charlotte on Monday and Tuesday in response to immigration raids and the use of federal force against protesters in Los Angeles. More protests are scheduled for Saturday in Charlotte, Monroe, Concord, Waxhaw, and Rock Hill.

Around 300 protesters gathered in Asheville’s Pack Square on Monday, despite heavy rain across Buncombe County.

Last week, Buncombe County Sheriff Quentin Miller disputed North Carolina U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis’ recent labeling of the county as a “sanctuary jurisdiction,” stating his office complies with state law HB10, which requires cooperation with ICE when certain criminal charges are involved.